Lifestyle

TOPICS:

4/2/09

Previous

PAGE: 

1 ... 

60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64

 ... 944

Next

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next

Christopher

Christopher

Portland, OR
November 2002

JUN 23, 2006 04:28 PM

One of the most joyous past-times for comic books fans is playing the game, "Who's Directing Alan Moore's Watchmen Now?" For a while, Terry Gilliam was attached. Now, it appears that Dawn of the Dead director Zach Snyder will be helming the project.

"Watchmen", which tells the story of the last remaining superheroes and the events surrounding the mysterious murder of one of their own, was one of the first superhero comic books to present itself as serious literature and popularized the more adult-oriented "graphic novel" format. It is also the only graphic novel to have won a Hugo Award and to appear on Time magazine's list of 100 best novels from 1923 to present.


Of course, DC Comics, publisher of Watchmen is owned by AOL Time Warner, publishers of the list. That being said, Watchmen is considered to be the novel that changed our modern day conceptions of comic books; let's hope that Mr. Snyder doesn't fuck it up too much and cast Ben Affleck as Rorschach.

darkgodz

darkgodz

Katy, TX
August 2003

JUN 23, 2006 05:07 PM

this is totally friggin awesome. one of the best graphic novels ever.

Margot_Dent

Margot_Dent

Los Angeles, CA
February 2004

JUN 23, 2006 05:10 PM

there's no way they WONT fuck up this movie

Cassiel

Cassiel

Aurora, CO
September 2004

JUN 23, 2006 05:11 PM

wouldn't it be more satisfying as a TV miniseries rather than a single film?

Nokturn

Nokturn

United Kingdom
April 2006

JUN 23, 2006 05:13 PM

It'll be Uwe Boll. Gaurenteed.
Ruination.
Oh no, there isn't a Watchmen game. Thank fuck for that. skull

Mr_Zero

Mr_Zero

I'm lost
September 2005

JUN 23, 2006 05:19 PM

Margot_Dent said:
there's no way they WONT fuck up this movie



+1

ardour

ardour

Ottawa, ON
March 2006

JUN 23, 2006 05:29 PM

this is totally friggin awesome. one of the best graphic novels ever.



The first statement is invalid because the second statement is correct. Hah.

ObservingOne

ObservingOne

Monroe, LA
April 2006

JUN 23, 2006 05:31 PM

I'll agree that the VAST majority of comic movies get screwed up. But I think it will be much easier to hold true to this one.

It's very difficult to be true to most comics in a movie due to the fact that most storylines are so long and involve so many complex characters with lots of back-story. You have to squeeze as much as you can into a 2 hour movie. Changes have to be made to do that.

But with this...it's a stand-alone story. If they screw it up, it's a crime.

ObservingOne

ObservingOne

Monroe, LA
April 2006

JUN 23, 2006 05:31 PM

(by the way I own the originals)

biggrin

fracturedguy

fracturedguy

Seattle, WA
November 2002

JUN 23, 2006 05:44 PM

Cassiel said:
wouldn't it be more satisfying as a TV miniseries rather than a single film?



That was what Terry Gilliam wanted to do with it. Or rather, it was offered to him, and he said that was the only woy ot would work.

I think most adaptations ought to be handled as miniseries rather than movies. But then again, I think art is more valuable than money, so what do I know?

Oryon

Oryon

Atlanta, GA
April 2004

JUN 23, 2006 06:04 PM

I once thought if one can film the LOTR movies and not toally fuck them up, anything is possible. this is not the case for Watchmen. it just doenst NEED to happen.

piracy

piracy

Whitwell, TN
January 2004

JUN 23, 2006 06:14 PM

i reread it just the other day, there's no fucking way hollywood can do this movie. it would take days to tell, like it took me years to understand.

all the casting could be interesting, but i'm really wondering who could play veidt?

and the comedian?

ObservingOne

ObservingOne

Monroe, LA
April 2006

JUN 23, 2006 06:21 PM

I'm hoping Paris Hilton gets a major part.

j/k

AndersWolleck

AndersWolleck

Astoria, NY
February 2003

JUN 23, 2006 06:22 PM

Oryon said:
I once thought if one can film the LOTR movies and not toally fuck them up, anything is possible. this is not the case for Watchmen. it just doenst NEED to happen.



make watchmen three 3 hour movies and i would scream to the heavens in glee!!!

OpticNerve

OpticNerve

Arlington, MA
November 2003

JUN 23, 2006 06:24 PM

Watchmen is totally unfilmable as a 2 hour film. There is just too much that goes on in the story. Hell, you could do a friggin' movie based on the issue featuring Rorschach.

CheshireCat

CheshireCat

Los Angeles, CA
January 2004

JUN 23, 2006 06:32 PM

I wish thi were good new but it will probably turn into garbage like most films based on books which to much going on...hello DUNE ANYONE?? ....THEY ONLY HALF GOT IT RIGHT THE SECOND TIME AROUND.,

c4ff31n3

c4ff31n3

I'm lost
November 2004

JUN 23, 2006 06:37 PM

There's no escaping it, it shall be fucked up.

JaceKilljoy

JaceKilljoy

Plainville, MA
January 2004

JUN 23, 2006 06:48 PM

ok one major point here...its being brought up by the same guy that fucked up remakeing one of the greatest horror movies of all time. I have no high hopes that the Watchmen will not be defaced any worse.

premortem

premortem

USA
October 2005

JUN 23, 2006 07:31 PM

In order to do justice to the entire story, "Watchmen" would need to be a multiple part project. The best venue for such an undertraking would be a cable channel such as HBO or Showtime, simply because the "made for TV" tag automatically waters down storyline. Key elements of the story would get censored out and we would be left with some godawful miniseries.
On the other hand, two 3 hour movies in the vein of LOTR or "Kill Bill" may be up to the task.
Mickey Rourke as Rorschach=pefect.

ChrisIsGod

ChrisIsGod

Chesapeake, VA
January 2006

JUN 23, 2006 07:41 PM

If Uwe Boll did get that movie. Well it would be one of the most depressing days in comic book history.

grahf

grahf

New York, NY
September 2002

JUN 23, 2006 07:54 PM

They could do Watchmen well as a single three-hour movie if they take out some backstory and the Tales of the Black Freighter parts, which I bet they will in any event. Basically, give it the LotR treatment. Just because the could do it well IMO though, I don't expect they actually will, especially with this news that Snyder will be directing. I suppose I'll check out 300 before I make any final predictions, but I'm not hopeful.

DeceptiviewFilm

DeceptiviewFilm

Parlin, NJ
February 2004

JUN 23, 2006 08:16 PM

Oryon said:
I once thought if one can film the LOTR movies and not toally fuck them up, anything is possible. this is not the case for Watchmen. it just doenst NEED to happen.



yeah but. Jackson had to fight long and hard to get them to make 3 movies. New line wanted the tale in 1 movie only. Him shooting all 3 back to back helped it alot.

twiglet

twiglet

United Kingdom
December 2005

JUN 23, 2006 08:32 PM

please please i really hope Zach dosen't pick it up (as much as i loved dawn of the dead) if only terry gilliam would pick it up again as a 3odd hour film it would be fuking amazing, but unfortunately i doubt he will... makes my feet sad that does frown

NoFi

NoFi

Redondo Beach, CA
February 2004

JUN 23, 2006 09:05 PM

i was hoping it was george a. romero.

zach who? confused wink

MuteEnt

MuteEnt

Brighton, MA
April 2006

JUN 23, 2006 09:09 PM

Terry gilliam needs to go do good omens and don quixote. No one needs to do watchmen.

Previous

PAGE: 

1 | 2 | 3 | 4

Next